Pages

Ads 468x60px

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Jury sentences Nidal Hasan to death for rampage

Jury sentences Nidal Hasan to death for rampage,  A military court sentenced Maj. Nidal Hasan to death on Wednesday for the 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood, giving the Army psychiatrist what he believed would be a path to martyrdom in the attack on unarmed fellow soldiers.

The American-born Muslim, who has said he acted to protect Islamic insurgents abroad from American aggression, never denied being the gunman. In opening statements, he acknowledged to the jury that he pulled the trigger in a crowded waiting room where troops were getting final medical checkups before deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan.

The same jurors who convicted Hasan last week had just two options: either agree unanimously that Hasan should die or watch the 42-year-old get an automatic sentence of life in prison with no chance of parole.

Hasan had no visible reaction when the verdict was read, staring first at the jury forewoman and then the judge. Officials said he will be taken back to a county jail and then transported on the first available military flight to the military prison at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas. The timing on the flight wasn't immediately clear.

Hasan could become the first American soldier executed in more than half a century. But because the military justice system requires a lengthy appeals process, years or even decades could pass before he is put to death.

The lead prosecutor assured jurors that Hasan would "never be a martyr" despite his attempt to tie the attack to religion.

"He is a criminal. He is a cold-blooded murderer," Col. Mike Mulligan said Wednesday in his final plea for a rare military death sentence. "This is not his gift to God. This is his debt to society. This is the cost of his murderous rampage."

For nearly four years, the federal government has sought to execute Hasan, believing that any sentence short of a lethal injection would deny justice to the families of the dead and the survivors who had believed they were safe behind the gates of the Texas base.

And for just as long, Hasan has seemed content to go to the death chamber for his beliefs. He fired his own attorneys to represent himself, barely put up a defense during a three-week trial and made almost no effort to have his life spared.

Mulligan reminded the jury that Hasan was a trained doctor yet opened fire on defenseless comrades. He "only dealt death," the prosecutor said, so the only appropriate sentence is death.

He was never allowed to argue in front of the jury that the shooting was necessary to protect Islamic and Taliban leaders from American troops. During the trial, Hasan leaked documents to journalists that revealed him telling military mental health workers in 2010 that he could "still be a martyr" if executed.

When Hasan began shooting, the troops were standing in long lines to receive immunizations and doctors' clearance. Thirteen people were killed and more than were 30 wounded. All but one of the dead were soldiers, including a pregnant private who curled on the floor and pleaded for her baby's life.


This combination image shows handout photos of the victims killed during the 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas. From top left, Michael Grant Cahill, 62, of Cameron, Texas; Maj. Libardo Eduardo Caraveo, 52, of Woodbridge, Va.; Staff Sgt. Justin M. DeCrow, 32, of Evans, Ga.; Capt. John Gaffaney, 56, of San Diego, Calif.; Spc. Frederick Greene, 29, of Mountain City, Tenn.; Sgt. Amy Krueger, 29, of Kiel, Wis.; Pfc. Aaron Thomas Nemelka, 19, of West Jordan, Utah; Spc. Jason Dean Hunt, 22, of Frederick, Okla.; Pfc. Michael Pearson, 22, of Bolingbrook, Ill.; Capt. Russell Seager, 51, of Racine, Wis.; Pvt. Francheska Velez, 21, of Chicago; Lt. Col. Juanita Warman, 55, of Havre de Grace, Md.; and Pfc. Kham Xiong, 23, of St. Paul, Minn. A military jury has sentenced Hasan to death for the 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood that killed 13 people and wounded more than 30 others.
The attack ended only when Hasan was shot in the back by an officer responding to the shooting. Hasan is now paralyzed from the waist down and uses a wheelchair.

The military called nearly 90 witnesses at the trial and more during the sentencing phase. But Hasan rested his case without calling a single person to testify in his defense and made no closing argument. Even with his life at stake during the sentencing hearing, he made no attempt to question witnesses and gave no final statement to jurors.

Death sentences are rare in the military, which has just five other prisoners on death row. The cases trigger a long appeals process. And the president must give final authorization before any service member is executed. No American soldier has been executed since 1961.

Hasan spent weeks planning the Nov. 5, 2009, attack, including buying the handgun and videotaping a sales clerk showing him how to change the magazine.

He later plunked down $10 at a gun range outside Austin and asked for pointers on how to reload with speed and precision. An instructor said he told Hasan to practice while watching TV or sitting on his couch with the lights off.

When the time came, Hasan stuffed paper towels in the pockets of his cargo pants to muffle the rattling of extra ammo and avoid arousing suspicion. Soldiers testified that Hasan's rapid reloading made it all but impossible to stop him. Investigators recovered 146 shell casings in the medical building and dozens more outside, where Hasan shot at the backs of soldiers fleeing toward the parking lot.

In court, Hasan never played the role of an angry extremist. He didn't get agitated or raise his voice. He addressed the judge as "ma'am" and occasionally whispered "thank you" when prosecutors, in accordance with the rules of evidence, handed Hasan red pill bottles that rattled with bullet fragments removed from those who were shot.

Arnold schwarzenegger and maria shriver separated

Arnold schwarzenegger and maria shriver separated, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Maria Shriver announced Monday that they are "amicably separating," but there was no mention of divorce in their joint statement.

Confirmation of their split came just two weeks after the 25th anniversary of their marriage and four months after Schwarzenegger left the California governor's office.

"This has been a time of great personal and professional transition for each of us," their statement said. "After a great deal of thought, reflection, discussion, and prayer, we came to this decision together."

The statement did not reveal when the separation began, but Shriver, 55, was not wearing her wedding band in a video posted on YouTube two weeks ago.

At this time, we are living apart, while we work on the future of our relationship," they said.
The marriage of Schwarzenegger, a bodybuilder-turned-actor, and Shriver, the niece of President John F. Kennedy, was considered an unlikely union, especially considering Shriver's deep Democratic roots and Schwarzenegger's Republican leanings.

Gallery: Arnold and Maria, the way they were
They became one of America's most famous couples. He was one of Hollywood's highest paid actors and she was a network news anchor. They both gave up those careers when he was elected governor of California in 2003, a job he held until this past January.

Schwarzenegger, 63, has been busy in recent months reviving his acting career, signing movies deals -- including another installment of his "Terminator" series.


The couple's children are ages 14, 18, 20 and 21.
"We are continuing to parent our four children together," they said. "They are the light and the center of both of our lives."

Gallery: Surprising celebrity splits
The statement did not say which one of them moved out of the Brentwood, California mansion where the family has resided.
"We consider this a private matter, and neither we nor any of our friends or family will have further comment," the statement said. "We ask for compassion and respect from the media and the public."

Chris brown seizure

Chris brown seizure, The Grammy award winning singer Chris Brown suffered a seizure brought on by extreme emotional stress and fatigue relating to legal matters and nonstop negativity, his publicist said yesterday.

The “Look At Me Now” singer suffered a non-epileptic seizure at a Hollywood recording studio on Friday morning.

According to TMZ, paramedics rushed to the scene at the Record Planet recording studios following an emergency call at 1:09AM.

Mr Brown apparently came around from his fit, refused treatment and did not want to be taken to hospital.

His publicist Nicole Perna told the Washington Post that doctors attributed the attack to: “intense fatigue and extreme emotional stress, both due to the continued onslaught of unfounded legal matters and the nonstop negativity.”

The singer, who won a Grammy in 2011 for Best R&B Album with “F.A.M.E.”, has been on probation since 2009 following an assault on his ex-girlfriend Rihanna.

A judge revoked his probation last month and ordered a hearing in a May 12 hit-and-run case, in which he is suspected of rear-ending a car stopped at a red light in the San Fernando Valley.

Brown allegedly refused to give the other driver his license or insurance information.

The driver of the other car said Brown was polite at first, but a confrontation arose after she kept demanding identification.

In February, the Sheriff’s Department investigated a fight between Brown and singer Frank Ocean at a recording studio, but Ocean declined to pursue a battery case against Brown.

The same month, Brown crashed his Porsche while being chased by paparazzi.

Jay Z rihanna chris brown

Jay Z rihanna chris brown, Jay-Z discovered Rihanna and has been her mentor ever since — you could even say he’s like a second father — but he’s never going to over-parent her. In a new interview the rap icon explained why he’s stayed in the background even during the times when RiRi’s relationship with Chris Brown has gotten rocky.

Jay-Z watches over Rihanna, 25, like she’s his own daughter, and if you’ve listened to any of his songs about Blue Ivy Carter, you know he’s a protective and proud daddy. So why hasn’t he driven Rihanna’s ex, Chris Brown, 24, out of the business after all the pain he’s caused her?


Jay-Z Won’t Try To Control Rihanna
“That’s not my place [to interfere],” Jay told Hot 97′s The Angie Show out of New York on July 10. “I can’t control the outcome of her life. I can’t intervene.”

Jay-Z continued to explain that he can only give Rihanna advice, but at the end of the day it’s up to her to decide how she wants to live. “I can give advice, if asked, you know, and that’s it. I can provide information, and then life has to play out. Life has to happen.”

Ah Jay-Z, so wise.

He is right though — especially with a strong personality like Rihanna, trying to control her would only push her further away. Jay suggested that he has plenty of “really good” advice to give RiRi on the topic of Chris, but he’s likely doing the right thing by not forcing it down her throat.

Jay-Z: ‘I Don’t Have Enough Time’ For Rihanna & Chris Brown
The 43-year-old rapper also admitted in the interview that he doesn’t exactly keep up on the ups and downs of Rihanna and Chris’ relationship. “I’m not into that,” he said, “I don’t have enough time in the day to invest in it.”

We don’t blame you, Jay, it takes real talent (we’re so humble) to keep up with the RiRi-CB roller coaster.

What do you think of Jay-Z’s approach to advising Rihanna, HollywoodLifers? Should he be more hands-on? Let us know!

Chris brown five years probation + six months community service

Chris brown five years probation + six months community service, A judge on Tuesday (Aug. 25) sentenced Chris Brown to five years' probation and six months' community labor for the beating of Rihanna and ordered the R&B singer to stay away from his former girlfriend for the next five years.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Patricia Schnegg told Brown that he could be sent to state prison if he violated any terms of his sentence, including an order to stay 100 yards away from Rihanna unless they're attending music industry events.

A probation report prepared for Tuesday's sentencing describes two previous violent incidents. It said the first happened about three months before the February beating while the couple was traveling in Europe; Rihanna slapped Brown during an argument, and he shoved her into a wall. In the second instance, Brown allegedly broke the front and passenger side windows on a Range Rover they were driving while visiting Barbados, Rihanna's home country. Neither attack was reported, the probation report states.

Brown will serve his sentence in his home state - Virginia - and his community labor will be overseen by the police chief in Richmond.

The judge said she wanted to ensure that Brown, 20, performs physical labor instead of community service, such as mentoring young people. He will also undergo a year of domestic violence counseling.

Rihanna did not attend Tuesday's sentencing.

At one point, Brown, who was accompanied by his mother, agreed to the terms of the sentence before Schnegg had finished going through them all.

The hearing had been planned for Thursday afternoon, but Brown's lawyer, Mark Geragos, asked to move up the singer's sentencing to Tuesday. A previous attempt to sentence Brown was postponed when Schnegg said she hadn't received adequate assurances that Brown would perform physical labor if allowed to serve probation in Virginia.

The judge said she was satisfied with a letter presented by Geragos that Richmond Police Chief Bryan T. Norwood will directly oversee Brown's labor program.

After Brown pleaded guilty to felony assault in June, Schnegg ordered the pair to stay away from each other and to not contact one another. Her order Tuesday essentially extended that until Brown completes his sentence.

Donald Etra, Rihanna's attorney, has said he didn't think the strict rules were necessary, but that he and Rihanna favored a less-stringent ruling that simply ordered Brown not to annoy, harass or molest the 21-year-old pop singer. He said after Tuesday's hearing that Rihanna did not object to the stay-away order, which allows the former couple to be within 10 yards of each other if they are attending music industry events.

Schnegg said she was aware of reports that Brown had been spotted on several occasions in the same places as Rihanna.

"I am not amused with the chatter that has been on the airwaves and any violation of your probation in this case comes with the potential for state prison," Schnegg told Brown.

A felony charge of making criminal threats was dropped during Tuesday's sentencing.

"We feel that the sentence for Mr. Brown is an equitable one," said Sandi Gibbons, a district attorney's spokeswoman. "He has his future in his hands. He has control of his fate."

Gibbons said Brown's charge could eventually be reduced to a misdemeanor if he completes his sentence.

Brown was arrested Feb. 8, hours after he was accused of beating Rihanna.

The attack occurred in Los Angeles' Hancock Park neighborhood as Brown drove a rented sports car. A Los Angeles police detective described a brutal attack in a search warrant affidavit filed in the case, stating Brown hit, choked and bit Rihanna and tried at one point to push her from the car.

Brown's career suffered after his arrest, with sponsors dropping him and radio stations refusing to play his music. Both he and Rihanna had to cancel several high-profile appearances, including planned performances at the Grammy Awards the day of the attack.

In a probation report released after the sentencing, Brown is quoted as saying he was "depressed" since the attack and that he "'does not want to carry on that cycle.'"

The report included letters of support for Brown from RCA/Jive Label Group Chairman Barry Weiss as well as an entertainment lawyer and a pastor.

Drake's 'Smoove' Album Cover Has Fans Doing Blue Ivy Double-Take

Drake's 'Smoove' Album Cover Has Fans Doing Blue Ivy Double-Take, VMA performer's Nothing Was the Same art sparks immediate reaction from fans.

Drake pushed the release date for his third album Nothing Was The Same just a few days to September 24, but he followed that announcement with the official cover art for his LP, just so we know it's real. Naturally, fans have had a lot to say about the new artwork, which some proclaimed was pure "greatness."

The VMA nominee unveiled the cover via Instagram on Wednesday featuring an image of baby Drake with a mini afro and a second side profile of a fully matured Aubrey. Placed next to it each other, the images find Drake staring at himself, and likely symbolize him taking glimpses at the past and the future.

The graphics are courtesy of painter and illustrator Kadir Nelson, who, according to Complex, has crafted projects for artists like Michael Jackson, publications like Sports Illustrated and even for the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Postal Service. Not to mention that he's penned best-selling books about famous figures that include Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King, Jr.

Reaction to the cover was immediate across social media. The image of baby Drake was "liked" by over 223, 000 fans on Instagram, while fully grow Aubrey was "liked" by more than 215, 000 fans with almost 4,000 comments. The rapper's tweet pegging Nelson to the cover art was retweeted nearly 2,500 times.

@RobynIsMyGal couldn't hide his enthusiasm, declaring that "Drake's New Album cover is just greatness predicted!" and @jimmyyadig agreed that it is a win, adding, "Drake's album cover for Nothing was the Same is dope and fits well with the album name."

A few fans felt like Drake took the liberty of giving himself a more sun-kissed look. "Besides the fact that Drake gave himself a tan "Nothing Was The Same" album cover look smoove dough," @HiArmaniXchange wrote, while @eriqofficiel simply wondered, "Why is drake darker on his album cover?"

And then there were those fans who thought that baby Drake looked very similar to one other very famous hip-hop baby. "Why is Blue Ivy on Drake's album cover?" ‏@MrVicks questioned, but @BBRENMAR declared it as fact, writing, "drake put blue ivy carter on his new album art #notmad." Other fans were all about the new cover.

George Zimmerman's wife pleads guilty to perjury

George Zimmerman's wife pleads guilty to perjury, The wife of George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch volunteer acquitted in the killing of Trayvon Martin, has been sentenced to one year probation and 100 hours of community service after pleading guilty to a misdemeanor perjury charge for lying at her husband's bond hearing.

Shellie Zimmerman, in court Wednesday, admitted that she perjured herself before Judge Kenneth Lester at an April 22, 2012, bond hearing for her husband. At that hearing, she told Lester, who was then presiding over her husband's case, that the couple had little funds.

But in a court filing, State Attorney Angela Corey said Shellie Zimmerman perjured herself by failing to reveal that George Zimmerman had collected more than $100,000 through Internet donations.

George Zimmerman instructed Shellie Zimmerman on how to transfer money from his bank account into hers and his sister's while he was in jail in April 2012, according to recordings of jail calls released by the Florida State Attorney's Office. According to an affidavit, Shellie Zimmerman transferred more than $74,000 to her personal account days before the April bond hearing. Nearly $50,000 was transferred to an account held by Zimmerman's sister.

Taped phone calls between the couple revealed that they had discussed the money transfers in code to hide the funds, according to the affidavit. Prosecutors allege that Zimmerman and his wife talked about $10, $20 and $100 to mask the fact that they were referring to thousands of dollars. The calls also showed that George Zimmerman instructed his wife to "pay off all the bills," including payments to American Express and Sam's Club.

Lester ruled on June 3, 2012, that Shellie Zimmerman had "testified untruthfully" about their finances. She was later arrested on June 12, 2012, and jailed briefly in Seminole County before posting a $1,000 bond.

George Zimmerman killed Trayvon Martin on Feb. 26, 2012, in a gated townhouse community in Sanford, Fla., as the teen returned home from buying snacks at a convenience store.

Zimmerman said he shot the unarmed teenager in self-defense after being attacked. A jury last month found Zimmerman not guilty of second-degree murder and manslaughter.

Shellie Zimmerman had originally faced a third-degree felony perjury charge but the court accepted a plea deal. Wednesday, she pleaded guilty to "perjury not in official proceedings," which is a misdemeanor. She also filed in open court a letter of apology to Lester. A copy of the letter was not immediately available to USA TODAY.

Assistant State Attorney John Guy, one of the attorneys who argued before the court at George Zimmerman's trial, was back in court to handle Shellie Zimmerman's case.

As part of Shellie Zimmerman's one year of probation, she was given a list of conditions she must abide by.

In part, she cannot possess, carry or own a firearm and must get permission to own any other type of weapon. She also must get permission from her probation officer before moving, changing jobs or leaving the county where she lives.

She must also report regularly to a probation officer, pay $263 in court fees/fines and pay the state of Florida $50 per month as a cost of supervision while on probation.

Her probation can also be revoked if she violates the law, associates with anyone engaged in criminal activity or uses any drugs not prescribed by a doctor.

Robert pattinson riley keough

Robert pattinson riley keough, Rob, you’ve just proved one more time that you are an impressive human being. Even though you really could date any woman you want after Kristen’s transgression, you’ve chosen NOT to hurt your ex.
Robert Pattinson, many people — men and women — would say that after Kristen Stewart cheated on you, you have every right to date whoever you want.


Robert Pattinson, You Are A Free Man
That’s right — you have the right to break the “girl code.” The “girl code” compromises that group of unwritten rules that 95% of the female population agrees, should be adhered to. And one of those key “girl code” rules is that a woman shouldn’t date one of her good friends’ exes.

Similarly, it’s considered extremely bad form for a guy to date his ex’s friends.

Now Rob, it appeared that you weren’t interested in adhering to the code, when you started dating actress, Riley Keough. Not only had she become friends with Kristen when they both starred in 21010′s The Runaways, but she and Kristen had remained friends.  In fact, such good friends that Riley was invited and attending Kristen’s birthday party on June 22, which isn’t exactly that long ago.

So when you broke up with KStew after a final blowout, and then started seeing Riley a few weeks later, it was surprising. After all, when you had the choice of any woman in the world, to start seeing — and believe me, millions of women were at your beck and call — why chose someone who was close to Kristen?

Being a guy, and let’s face it — guys tend to be less sensitive about these things than women — I can see that you probably just thought, ‘well, I kind of like Riley, I’m single, so I’ll ask her out.’

Your Situation With Kristen Is Different Than Others
It probably never occurred to you that you might be crossing some invisible line that exists among women, and that dating Riley might be especially hurtful to her versus you seeing someone who was completely out of your circle of friends.

And let’s face it Rob, a lot of people — even women — would say that Kristen’s deeply regretted cheating episode, nevertheless, dissolved her from receiving any consideration from you on the dating front. After all, you were the injured party and thus all “normal” rules wouldn’t apply.

I have to admit that I’m in that camp. After the public heartbreak you endured, you’re entitled to date any single woman, in my opinion.

But your situation IS complicated because Kristen was also so publicly and privately remorseful, and you two managed to put your relationship back together for a few months, and had some very happy times together again. You obviously forgave her … to a degree. So the that may have put  the “girl code rule”, back in force, in some women’s minds.

Kristen however, did accept that you were seeing with Riley, without complaint, even though she was incredibly sad and depressed after the split. We heard from sources close to her that she blamed only herself and her cheating for the breakup.

She was only surprised by the suddenness and completeness of the split — since you did cut off seeing her, calling and texting her, completely.

You Don’t Owe Kristen, But It’s Nice You’re Showing Respect
Nevertheless, she abided by your obvious decision to cut off all contact and didn’t reach out. It also seemed that she consciously or unconsciously agreed that you were entitled to date Riley, even though she had been her friend.

“In this specific case, Robert owes Kristin nothing. She made the misstep that ended their relationship and he is free to find happiness wherever he can,” believes  relationship expert from WPLJ radio, Cooper Lawrence.

Despite my and Cooper’s opinion, you’ve now decided to cool your jets with Riley, a source has told HollywoodLife.com exclusively.

“He doesn’t want to be ‘that guy.’ He doesn’t want the image of him being that he is stealing her friend in the wake of the relationship with Kristen,” the insider explains. “He loved Kristen and always will look at her fondly, but he doesn’t want to be defined by her, and by dating Riley it would only continue the link to Kristen.”

Being Honest With Kristen Was The Right Thing To Do
Rob, you finally saw and discussed all this with Kristen when you went over to her place over the weekend of August 2nd, and had your first face-to-face since the split.

Plus, you surprisingly went above and beyond, taking a thoughtful step forward when you very sweetly spoke to Kristen. “He reassured her that he wasn’t going to date her friends and make things more awkward between them, because the breakup is and has been awkward enough,” the source told us.

This just tells me Rob, what a stellar and respectful guy you are. Very few men would have the sensitivity to, #1, have had this discussion with their ex, and #2, make this decision and commitment to your ex, not to hurt her more. And especially after she gave you so much pain.

“This just shows what a nice, sensitive, caring guy he is. Any woman would be lucky to have him in their corner,” agrees celebrity relationship expert, Dr. Gilda Carle, 30-second therapist of Today.com.

“You know when you’re broken up, you’re free to date anyone. However, a classy way to behave is to not date your exes’ friends.”

So Rob, there you have it, and Kristen knows it, too. You were a wonderful boyfriend, but now you’re being an A-plus ex. Do you agree HollywoodLifers? Let me know! Would love to hear your thoughts.

Teen choice awards 2013

Teen choice awards 2013, Gestern Abend war es mal wieder so weit! Die von Künstlern und Fans ersehnten Teen Choice Awards wurden verliehen! Wie in jedem Jahr gab es aus diesem Grund ein reges Aufgebot an vor allem jungen Stars und Sternchen in Los Angeles.

Richtig freuen durfte sich bei der diesjährigen Preisverleihung Demi Lovato (20), die von ihren Fans insgesamt vier Auszeichnungen verliehen bekam, unter anderem als beliebtester weiblicher Musikstar. Zusammen mit der Teenie-Band One Direction - insgesamt vier Preise - gehörte sie zu den Abräumern des Abends. Durfte sich im letzten Jahr noch der erste Part von "Twilight - Breaking Dawn" über einige Auszeichnungen freuen, so räumte der zweite Teil auch in diesem Jahr mehrere Preise ab.

Der berührenste Moment der Teen Choice Awards war sicherlich der Auftritt von Lea Michele (26). Sie bekam den Preis für die beliebteste Schauspielerin in einer Comedy-Serie und bewegte mit ihrer Dankesrede, die natürlich auch ihrem verstorbenen Freund Cory Monteith (✝31) galt.

Hier könnt ihr euch die gesamte Gewinnerliste der Teen Choice Awards 2013 anschauen:

Choice Movie - Action: “Iron Man 3”
Choice Movie Actor Action: Robert Downey, Jr., “Iron Man 3”
Choice Movie Actress Action: Anne Hathaway, “The Dark Knight Rises”
Choice Movie Sci-Fi/Fantasy: “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2”
Choice Movie Actor Sci-Fi/Fantasy: Taylor Lautner, “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2”
Choice Movie Actress: Sci-Fi/Fantasy: Kristen Stewart, “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2”
Choice Movie - Drama: “The Perks of Being a Wallflower”
Choice Movie Actor - Drama: Logan Lerman, “The Perks of Being a Wallflower”
Choice Movie Actress - Drama: Emma Watson, “The Perks of Being a Wallflower”
Choice Movie - Comedy: “Pitch Perfect”
Choice Movie Actor - Comedy: Skylar Astin, “Pitch Perfect”
Choice Movie Actress - Comedy: Rebel Wilson, “Pitch Perfect”
Choice Movie - Romance: “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2”
Choice Movie Actor - Romance: Robert Pattinson, “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2”
Choice Movie Actress - Romance: Kristen Stewart, “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2″
Choice Movie Villain: Adam DeVine, “Pitch Perfect”
Choice Movie Scene Stealer: Kellan Lutz, “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2”
Choice Movie Breakout Star: Nicholas Hoult, “Warm Bodies”

TV

Choice TV Show - Drama: “Pretty Little Liars”
Choice TV Actor - Drama: Ian Harding, “Pretty Little Liars”
Choice TV Actress - Drama: Troian Bellisario, “Pretty Little Liars”
Choice TV Show - Fantasy/Sci-Fi: “The Vampire Diaries”
Choice TV Actor - Fantasy/Sci-Fi: Ian Somerhalder, “The Vampire Diaries”
Choice TV Actress - Fantasy/Sci-Fi: Nina Dobrev, “The Vampire Diaries”
Choice TV Show - Action: “NCIS: Los Angeles”
Choice TV Actor - Action: LL Cool J, “NCIS: Los Angeles”
Choice TV Actress - Action: Lucy Liu, “Elementary”
Choice TV Show - Comedy: GLEE
Choice TV Actor - Comedy: Jim Parsons, “The Big Bang Theory”
Choice TV Actress - Comedy: Lea Michele, GLEE
Choice TV - Animated Show: The Simpsons
Choice TV - Reality Competition Show: The X Factor
Choice TV - Reality Show: “Keeping Up with the Kardashians”
Choice TV Villain: Janel Parrish, “Pretty Little Liars”
Choice TV Personality – Male: Simon Cowell, The X Factor
Choice TV Personality – Female: Demi Lovato, The X Factor
Choice TV Female Reality Star: The Kardashians & Jenners, “Keeping Up with the Kardashians”
Choice TV Male Reality Star: Kevin Jonas, “Married to Jonas”
Choice TV Male Scene Stealer: Chord Overstreet, GLEE
Choice TV Female Scene Stealer: Miley Cyrus, “Two and a Half Men”
Choice TV Breakout Star: Blake Jenner, GLEE
Choice TV Breakout Show: “The Fosters”

Musik

Choice Male Artist: Justin Bieber
Choice Female Artist: Demi Lovato
Choice Music Group: One Direction
Choice R&B Artist: Bruno Mars
Choice Hip-Hop/Rap Artist: Macklemore & Ryan Lewis
Choice Rock Group: Paramore
Choice Electronic Dance Music (EDM) Artist: David Guetta
Choice Male Country Artist: Hunter Hayes
Choice Female Country Artist: Taylor Swift
Choice Country Group: Lady Antebellum
Choice Country Song: “We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together,” Taylor Swift
Choice Single - Female Artist: “Heart Attack,” Demi Lovato
Choice Single - Male Artist: “Beauty And A Beat,” Justin Bieber, featuring Nicki Minaj
Choice Single - Group: “Live While We’re Young,” One Direction
Choice R&B/Hip-Hop Song: “Can’t Hold Us,” Macklemore & Ryan Lewis, featuring Ray Dalton
Choice Rock Song: “Radioactive,” Imagine Dragons
Choice Love Song: “Little Things,” One Direction
Choice Break-Up Song: “Come and Get It,” Selena Gomez (21)
Choice Music Breakout Artist: Ed Sheeran
Choice Music Breakout Group: Emblem3

Fashion

Choice Style Icon: Miley Cyrus
Choice Female Hottie: elena Gomez
Choice Male Hottie: Harry Styles
Choice Smile: Harry Styles

Sport

Choice Female Athlete: Gabby Douglas
Choice Male Athlete: David Beckham

Andere

Choice Comedian: Ellen DeGeneres
Choice Web Star: Cimorelli
Choice Social Network: Twitter
Candie’s Choice Style Icon: Demi Lovato
Choice Twitter Personality: Justin Bieber

Themen:  Teen Choice Awards, One Direction, Selena Gomez, Lea Michele

Kristen stewart and robert pattinson dating august 2013?

Kristen stewart and robert pattinson dating august 2013?, I would not be surprised AT ALL if this story ended up being true. According to a new report from OMG! UK, Kristen Stewart is secretly dating her Camp X-Ray co-star Lane Garrison.
Kristen does have a habit of dating her co-stars – she met Michael Angarano while making Speak, and then she obviously met Robert Pattinson during the Twilight films.

And then she had an affair with Rupert Sanders, but he was her director instead of her co-star – which is close enough. So was Kristen unable to resist dating yet another co-star?
The report states that Kristen and Lane became ‘super close after meeting on set.‘ The report then takes it to the next level by adding that Kristen and Lane are ‘moving in’ together. See, they should have just stopped at ‘becoming super close’, because now I don’t believe them anymore. Kristen’s quick to get attached in relationships, but nobody’s that quick!

The report also touches upon Lane’s past with drunk driving and battery, but a ‘source’ adds,”[Kristen] understands his violent past but trusts that he’s changed and is really enjoying getting to know him.”

Look, I believe that Kristen and Lane are ‘getting close’ on set, largely because that usually happens between co-stars. And I believe that Kristen may possible know about his past, but she probably doesn’t care. And there might even be a little flirting – with dating a possibility in the future. But moving in? First of all, they’re both still shooting the movie, so where exactly would they move to? Secondly, all the legitimate reports state that Kristen’s still pining after Rob, so this guy might be a rebound, nothing more.

What do you  guys think about Kristen possibly dating yet another co-star in Lane Garrison? Do you think she should stop dating co-stars? At least, there’s no risk of sequels with this film.

Simon cowell happy and excited

Simon cowell happy and excited, Music mogul Simon Cowell, who is expecting his first child with New York City socialite Lauren Silverman, says he can't wait to become a father.

"I'm happy and excited," showbizspy.com quoted Cowell as saying at the London premiere of One Direction's new movie, This Is Us.

"Unfortunately, I have to keep this for the private moment. It's just one of those things. But thank you very much anyway," said Cowell.

Cowell, who split from ex-fiance Mezhgan Hussainy long time back, also insists that he can't talk about his relationship with Silverman openly because it's a sensitive subject.

"I would love to talk, but I have to respect a lot of people's feelings right now. There are a lot of things I will eventually clear up when the time is right, but I really have to be sensitive because there's a lot of people's feelings involved here," he added.

Silverman was previously married to businessman Andrew Silverman.

Simon cowell lauren silverman pregnant

Simon cowell lauren silverman pregnant, The New York socialite is "around 10 weeks along," an insider shares.

Silverman, 36, is married to Andrew Silverman, a real estate mogul in New York and a close friend of Simon, 53, but they have been estranged.

She reportedly plans to leave her husband to be with Cowell.

"Lauren and Andrew have been unhappy in their marriage for some time, and their divorce has been in the works for a while," a source dished.

"As their marriage deteriorated, she and Simon became close."

Cowell's reps were unavailable for comment, but if the celebrity gossip magazine is to be believed, it sure would be a change for the famous bachelor.

"God, no. I couldn't have children. If I had them here drawing on the walls I'd go nuts," he said in 2009. "You've got a routine you can't escape from."

In 2012, however, he sang a different tune to AOL Music.

"Well...yes," he said when asked if he'd changed his mind about children. "And no. I do really, really like kids, because I can talk to them and listen to them."

"The problem has always been how much time you need to devote to them. I've always dedicated all my life to work, and at 52, I've probably missed the opportunity."

Or not! We'll find out soon enough if the rumor is true ...

Bear paw mountains chief joseph surrenders

Bear paw mountains chief joseph surrenders, Before entering the landscape of the Bear Paw Mountains of Montana, Joseph’s people survived fierce fighting at Canyon Creek and left the battlefield with General Howard far behind.  They were unaware, however, of a new threat coming toward them from the southeast. Moving rapidly were about 520 officers, soldiers, scouts and civilians under the command of Colonel Nelson A. Miles.

The Nez Perce made camp on September 29, 1877 along Snake Creek in the Bear Paws. They now numbered about 700 people, with more than 200 warriors. The weather turned cold, but as they made a place to sleep they felt somewhat secure protected by the rolling hills and their belief that Howard’s soldiers had given up the chase at last.  Knowing Canada was only about 40 miles north, they began at last to feel as if they would reach safety.  But unknown to the sleeping Nez Perce, Miles' Cheyenne and Lakota scouts were searching frantically for their camp.  Many of these scouts had fought against Miles only a year earlier during the Sioux War of 1876.

The Nez Perce Village Is Found

Early the next morning, scouts Young Two Moon, Hump and Starving Elk under command of Louis Shambo crept close to the ground, being careful not to expose themselves as they followed a few Nez Perce back to the village. The scouts carefully peered over the brow of a hill and for the first time spotted the Nez Perce pony herd. They did not see the village, sited on lower ground, but they had found the horses and that was enough. They rushed back to tell Miles they had at last found the elusive Nez Perce.

Like Custer before the Battle of the Little Bighorn, Miles worried that the Nez Perce, which the army had tried to drive into a corner for 1,500 miles, might slip away as they had so many times before, only this time across the border into Canada.

The Battle of Bear Paw Begins

Miles placed the 2nd and 7th Cavalry on the front line from left to right with the 5th Infantry (mounted on horseback) covering the rear. With the village at last in view the scouts veered left toward the prized pony herd.  The cavalry charged.

Vigilant Nez Perce had spotted the approaching danger and warriors had had time to conceal themselves in ravines and coulees. The non-combatants moved out of the way, north along Snake Creek. The soldiers, facing the Nez Perce for the first time with little understanding of their tactical skill, imagined the Indians were on the run. When the 7th Cavalry reached the brow of the hills they were met with devastating rifle fire that stopped the charge and pushed the attackers back. As the cavalry retreated they left their wounded between the lines, either unable to move or afraid to crawl away for fear of being killed. The Nez Perce might have had an opportunity to escape again, but because the scouts had captured the horses a daylight flight was impossible.Intermittent fighting continued with both sides testing each other without a decisive victory. At the close of the first day of the Bear Paw Battle the Nez Perce still controlled their village. They dug shelter pits for the non-combatants in the coulees along Snake Creek while the soldiers established positions completely surrounding the village.

The Cold Night

Under cover of darkness the Nez Perce fortified their positions as best they could while the officers and soldiers planned and prepared for the following day. The army kept a strong vigilance to prevent the village from escaping into the dark.

Soldiers who had been hit lay between the lines overnight suffering from the terrible cold. Some of the badly wounded died during the night. Those still alive heard quiet but resolute footsteps approaching, followed by looming shadows of warriors bending over them. Soldiers protected behind the lines imagined a horrible death for their wounded comrades.

In his definitive history of the Nez Perce War, Nez Perce Summer 1877, Jerome Greene explains that the warriors, searching for weapons and ammunition, had no intention of harming the soldiers. Greene relates a poignant story of one soldier who continually cried out for water to his comrades behind the lines. A warrior approached, took the soldier’s ammunition belt but left him a can of water. The Nez Perce war remained a different kind of Indian war right up until the end.

The Second Day

The next morning Miles' scouts approached the Nez Perce lines to negotiate a meeting. Not long afterwards, under a flag of truce, Yellow Bull approached the soldier lines and from there carried the first message from Miles to Joseph asking to talk. These efforts were successful and Joseph and Miles met. During this brief truce both sides recovered their wounded and dead.For reasons never clarified by Miles, Joseph was taken prisoner immediately after negotiations ended. In a strange circumstance of fate, Lt. Lovell Jerome had been allowed entry into the Nez Perce camp and was roaming unharmed.  When the Nez Perce learned Joseph was being held, they captured the young lieutenant.  Rather than killing him as some in the village wanted to do, the Nez Perce offered to trade him for Joseph.   Whatever plan Miles had for Joseph was forgotten. On the morning of October 2, Jerome and Joseph were exchanged under a flag of truce.

That evening a 12-pounder Napoleon gun arrived accompanied by much needed supplies for the command. This cannon, which fired explosive shells, would play a pivotal role in the final chapter of the Nez Perce journey.

Placed where it had an unobstructed view of the ravines where the non-combatants were hidden, the 12-pounder started firing the next morning.   The Nez Perce awoke under a barrage of fire they had never experienced. As powerful and frightening as the weapon was, it could not drive the Nez Perce from their fortified positions but it did cause them to believe the end was near.

During the two days of fighting, Miles lost 21 soldiers killed, 26 wounded (three of whom later died), and two scouts wounded.  Nearly all of his casualties occurred on the first day during the failed cavalry charge. Yellowstone Kelly, a well-known frontier scout serving with Miles, lost a good friend, Corporal John Haddo. Two 7th Cavalry officers who had survived the Battle of the Little Bighorn without a scratch were wounded here.

The total Nez Perce killed is unknown, but probably 20 to 25 killed with about 50 to 60 wounded.  But among the dead were three of the leaders -- Looking Glass, Toohoolhoolzote, and Joseph’s brother, Ollokot.  At a place known today as “Death’s Point of Rocks,” where fighting was particularly heavy, five warriors were killed.

Chief Joseph From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever

Chief Joseph From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever, Unpublished letters and diaries by eyewitnesses, interviews with decedents, an intimate knowledge of the country enrich this narrative of the heroic Nez Perce Indian War waged in 1877 against relocation.

The result is a well documented chronicle offering new perspective on prewar Indian-white relations, United States government pressures and nontreaty rebellions, the five battles, subjection and surrender, and on the character of the leaders on both sides.

“From where the sun now stands I will fight no more forever,” Chief Joseph said in surrender. But as a guardian and protector of his people he at last succeeded in bringing back the remaining members of his tribe to their beloved valley.

Calling Professor Beal’s book, “definitive, but not final,” Herman J. Deutsch, professor emeritus of American history at Washington State University, writes in the foreword: “Joseph and his band remain an example and inspiration to those who today are seeking recognition as human beings, equal in the sight of God and therefore entitled to like status among men.

Those who recognize that such aspirations must not for long remain unfulfilled can derive from Nez Perce history examples of the consequences of policies conceived in ignorance and colored with disdain of the culture and way of life of minority peoples. ...A world surfeited with deceptive success stories can ill afford to forget a people and their leader who attained their true moral stature as they were facing their doom.”

Chief joseph's surrender speech

Chief joseph's surrender speech, Tell General Howard I know his Heart. What He told me before I have in my heart. I am tired of fighting, Looking Glass is dead. too-Hul-hul-sote is dead.

The old men are all dead. It is the young men who say yes or no. He who led on the young men is dead. It is cold and we have no blankets. The little children are freezing to death. My people, some of them have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are--perhpas freezing to death. I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead. Hear me, my chiefs. I am tired; my heart is sick and sad. From where the sun now stands I will fight no more forever." 1

1 Brown, Mark H., The Flight of the Nez Perce, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, 1967, p. 407.

Historical Note: Mark Brown may have been one of the first Historians to question whether or not Joseph actually gave the surrender speech as taken by Lieutenant C. E. S. Wood. Or, did Lt. Wood paraphrase Joseph's words. Please refer to page 407 of "The flight of the Nez Perce" for discussion.

It should be noted that the Speech is consistent with Joseph's eloquence as a speaker. It is reasonable to assume that the surrender speech was very near what Lt. Wood reported or perhaps edited slightly as Lt. Wood was later trying to recall and document Joseph's words. It should also be noted that Lt. Wood made the transcription of the speech at time of delivery and that both Lt. Wood and General Howard may have edited the transcription.

March on Washington commemorated by thousands gathering at Lincoln Memorial

March on Washington commemorated by thousands gathering at Lincoln Memorial, A half-century to the day the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his clarion call for justice from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, thousands began to reconvene near that spot Wednesday, under cloudy skies and amid hope and frustration about the current state of race relations in America.

The plans to honor one of the nation’s high-water marks of peaceful protest and rhetorical triumph included church services, national bell ringing and a crammed roster of speakers including two former presidents and Oprah Winfrey. The lineup culminates in the afternoon when the country’s first African American president addresses the world from the marble steps that King sanctified for eternity.

Some celebrants set off on the actual path of the 250,000 who marched on Aug. 28, 1963, retracing the footfalls that helped begin a cultural earthquake and eventually shook apart the bulwarks of legal discrimination against African Americans. There were long lines at the security checkpoints, and some people were treated for heated-related conditions by medical personnel.

Umbrellas and ponchos took the place of mid-century fedoras and skinny ties. But some still talked of recapturing the mood of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, an event that has been described as a day of euphoria amid the chaos and clashes of the 1960s. And they spoke of reclaiming the unfinished business of the movement at a time when African Americans still lag far behind whites on economic and educational attainment.

“Fifty years ago we had to convince the president to let us come. Today, the president is coming to us,” exulted Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District’s non-voting member of Congress, as the crowd grew around her. Back in ‘63, she was one of the young staffers organizing the march.

For marcher Tara Childs, the number of black faces she sees in unemployment offices tells her King’s dream is far from realized.

“The issues they were marching for in 1963 were economic,” said Childs, 35, co-chair of Young and Powerful, a national group of young professionals, as she headed toward the Mall. “When I see the footage, I am moved, because I feel we are still combating the same issues. The unemployment rate is still . . . disproportionately high among African Americans.”

Others were ready to celebrate five decades of racial progress that means many young people are more familiar with sharing playgrounds, classrooms and bedrooms with members of other races than with the segregation and resistance to change of King’s era.

For David Figari, the moment seemed perfect to cement his own relations across racial lines. On the steps of the Georgetown University Law Center, just before setting out on a 1.7-mile march to the Lincoln Memorial, Figari, who is white, asked Jessica Jones, who is black, to marry him. They are both 25-year- olds from Tampa.

He knelt on the steps in front of his girlfriend and held out a ring. She said yes, and their fellow marchers exploded in cheers.

Figari had planned to propose in November, when the couple would be on a ski trip together. But he changed his plans when they decided to join the commemoration of the ’63 march.

I figured this would be a little more deep,” he said. “I think our relationship brings the whole idea of the march to fruition.”

At an interfaith service Wednesday morning at Shiloh Baptist Church in Northwest Washington, faith leaders reprised King’s message in the context of their own traditions, from Sikh to Southern Baptist.

“Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that,” said Imam Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America. Magid recalled how he leaned on King’s memory in the period of violence against Muslims after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. “It brought tears to my eyes. His message of diversity is that God created all people. That we can walk together on the path of peace”

King’s legacy has formed a part of the basic curriculum at her children’s school, said Rabbi Julie Schonfield, executive vice president of the Rabbinical Assembly. “The first history they are taught is the history of the civil rights movement.”

The day was the second major commemoration of the march this week, causing some confusion on social media by those seeking the official remembrance. The duplication reflected, in some ways, generational divisions in the civil rights community that have widened in a half century.

An event Saturday that also brought thousands to the Mall event was organized by the National Action Network, a group headed by the Rev. Al Sharpton. Wednesday’s gathering featured involvement of the NAACP and other legacy civil rights groups. Both had participation from members of the King family.

Still, the lines at security checkpoints were long by noon Wednesday, despite hot muggy weather on a workday. That was an oppressive contrast to the splendid sunshine of Saturday’s event and less forgiving than the glorious summer day that greeted marchers 50 years ago. On Saturday, umbrellas were a shield against the sun. On Wednesday they were protection against the rain.

“I think it’s going to clear up,” declared Aijalon McMillian, 20, of new Brunswick, N.J., as his friend opened an umbrella in the sprinkling rain. “I think the sun’s going to come out.”

It wasn’t just rosy nostalgia that had veteran marchers remembering the day of the original gathering as just about ideal.

“By Washington standards, August 28, 1963 was an extremely pleasant summer day here, with temperatures ranging between 63 and 83 degrees, no rain, and dew points in the comfortable 50s,” said Don Lipman of the Post’s Capital Weather Gang.

Heavy skies or not, many came to note their own history with Jim Crow and, in some cases, the personal outrages that brought them to Washington 50 years ago.

Nannie Blakeney remembers when her grandmother was a housekeeper for a white family. Blakeney would play with the family’s children, but wasn’t permitted to sit down with them for lunch.

“I wanted to eat with the little girl, and they said I had to eat in the kitchen,” she said. “I kept asking my grandmother, ‘Why? Why?’ She said because if you don’t they’ll beat you.”

Blakeney was 13 when she made the trip from Virginia to the March on Washington in 1963. She heard King talk about his dream and “ thought it might come true,” she said. “We’ve come a long way. I have mixed-race grandchildren now.”

Others on the Mall Wednesday were born long after the laws that assigned bus seats and lunch spots based on the color of a customer’s skin. But the young brought their own concerns to the Mall Wednesday, from scarce jobs to rampant violence.

Antoine Pendleton, 23, said both were on his mind on this 50 anniversary.

“I’m a black male trying to succeed out here,” said Pendleton, a recent graduate of Taney Institute, a historically black college, who works at a home in Pittsburgh for people with severe disabilities. “Get the guns off the street. I’m trying to make it to the 75th anniversary.”

One of the first speakers this morning noted the political gains that flowed from the March on Washington have yet to be realized in the March’s very location: Washington, D.C.

“Full freedom and democracy were – and are – still denied to the people who literally live within sight of the Capitol dome,” said D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray (D), speaking from the podium at the Lincoln Memorial. He noted that D.C. residents, who served in the U.S. armed forces, pay federal taxes and outnumber the populations of some states, lack voting representation in Congress.

“So, today, as we remember those who gave so much half a century ago to extend the blessings of liberty to all Americans,” Gray said, “I hope you will stand with me when I say that we must allow freedom to ring from Mount St. Alban. . .rom the ridges of Anacostia. . .and. . .apitol Hill itself.”

If the marchers of 1963 would have been agog at the idea of black president five decades later, they may have been even more stunned by the hyper-merchandizing that surrounds him. The vendors were out in force Wednesday with $10 Obama piggy banks, $3 first-family tote bags and much more.

And then there was Obama himself. Two of him, if you count the cardboard cutout of the president that Catherine Nanfuka carried over her shoulder.

On Wednesday she could barely move 10 feet without being approached by someone who asked to be photographed the life-sized, but flat, president.

“It makes me so happy,” Nanfuka said. “You should see the reaction. People say ‘I can’t believe it’s free to take a picture. Here, take a dollar!” But, no, it’s free.”


Hamil Harris, DeNeen Brown, and Julie Zauzmer contributed to this story.

Soldiers national cemetery gettysburg pa

Soldiers national cemetery gettysburg pa, Gettysburg National Cemetery is the final resting place for more than 3,500 Union soldiers killed in the Battle of Gettysburg, a Union victory often cited as a turning point in the Civil War. Numerous monuments stand in both the cemetery and battlefield to commemorate the Union and Confederate troops who fought there. At the cemetery’s dedication on November 19, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln rose to deliver “a few appropriate remarks,” now known as the Gettysburg Address.  His two-minute speech served as a reminder of the sacrifices of war and the necessity of holding the Union together.

Today, the battlefield and national cemetery form the Gettysburg National Military Park, a National Park Service unit dedicated to preserving and interpreting the battle, its aftermath, and the repercussions of Lincoln’s famous words. A visitors center and museum offer tours and auto, cycling, and hiking paths to park guests. The Gettysburg National Cemetery is one of 14 national cemeteries managed by the National Park Service.

In June 1863, Confederate forces under the command of Robert E. Lee pushed into Union territory.  The Confederacy hoped that by bringing the war into the northern states, northern politicians would abandon the war and normalize the South’s secession.  Union forces responded to the invading army, culminating in a confrontation near the town of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.

For three days, more than 150,000 soldiers clashed in a series of Confederate assaults and Union defenses.  On the third day of the battle, Lee ordered an assault on the Union’s center, a move now known as Pickett’s Charge.  More than 12,500 Confederate soldiers marched on the Union position, coming under intense artillery fire.  Union guns decimated the attacking Confederates, injuring or killing nearly 50 percent of the approaching brigades.  The charge’s strategic failure and loss of men forced Lee into retreat. Three days of fighting at Gettysburg took a horrible toll on both sides, 10,000 soldiers killed or mortally wounded, 30,000 injured, and 10,000 captured or missing.

After the battle, bodies lay scattered throughout Gettysburg’s farmlands. Burial work commenced quickly as fears of epidemic rose.  The dead were hastily buried in shallow graves on the battlefield, crudely identified by pencil writing on wooden boards. Rain and wind began eroding the impromptu graves, and Gettysburg’s citizens called for the creation of a soldiers’ cemetery for the proper burial of the Union dead.

With the support of the Pennsylvania Governor, a committee formed to select an appropriate site for the cemetery and oversee the interment of Union remains.  The site chosen encompassed the hill from which the Union center repulsed Pickett’s Charge.  State-appropriated funds purchased the property, and the reburial process began four months after the battle on October 27, 1863.

Confederate burials did not receive placement in the national cemetery.  Efforts in the 1870s by Southern veterans' societies eventually relocated 3,200 Confederate remains to cemeteries in Virginia, Georgia, and the Carolinas, such as Hollywood Cemetery in Richmond, Virginia. A few Confederates do remain interred at Gettysburg National Cemetery.

A few weeks after the burial process started, a dedication ceremony was held at the yet to be completed Soldiers' National Cemetery.  The cemetery committee chose Massachusetts statesman and orator Edward Everett to deliver the main speech. The committee asked President Abraham Lincoln to deliver “a few appropriate remarks.”  At the November 19 ceremony, Everett spoke for two hours on the causes of war and the events that led to the Battle of Gettysburg.  After his remarks, Lincoln rose and spoke for two minutes; his brief speech today is known as the “Gettysburg Address.”  His speech honored the brave men who fought and invoked their sacrifice as a cause to continue fighting for the preservation of the nation.

Landscape architect William Saunders designed the cemetery as a wide semi-circle, radiating from a central point to be decorated with a grand monument.  The cemetery’s sections were divided by state; smaller states closest to the monument and larger states along the outer portions.  Reinterments continued through March 1864.

Construction of the cemetery’s Soldiers' National Monument began in 1865 and culminated with a dedication ceremony on July 1, 1869.  The Batterson-Canfield Company provided the design of the monument, a granite memorial with a shaft rising from a four-cornered pedestal and decorated with sculptured by Randolph Rogers.  At the sides of the pedestal are four marble statues representing war, history, plenty, and peace.  The statue “Genius of Liberty” crowns the monument’s shaft.  The monument is notable as being near the location of the dais of the dedication ceremony where Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address.  Numerous smaller monuments also dot the cemetery’s landscape, including a memorial to the Union soldiers of New York and a monument to President Lincoln.

By 1872, construction of the cemetery was complete, and administration of the national cemetery transferred to the Federal Government.  In 1879, the cemetery erected a rostrum near the Taneytown Road entrance. While far from the site where Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address, the brick rostrum served as a platform for other presidents attending memorial ceremonies at Gettysburg, including Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Between 1898 and 1968, the government added sections to accommodate the graves of veterans from the Spanish-American War, World Wars I and II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War.  The cemetery’s annex is located due north of the historic original 17-acre property.  Today, more than 6,000 veterans lay at rest in the national cemetery.

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal, Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war.

We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sence, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.

It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced.

It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Abraham lincoln gettysburg address

Abraham lincoln gettysburg address, Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that "all men are created equal."

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of it, as a final resting place for those who died here, that the nation might live.

This we may, in all propriety do. But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow, this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have hallowed it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here; while it can never forget what they did here.

It is rather for us the living, we here be dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.

The narrative of sojourner truth

The narrative of sojourner truth, Sojourner Truth (ca. 1799-1883) is renowned for her work as an itinerant preacher and public speaker. During the nineteenth century, she was best known for her spontaneously devout reply to Frederick Douglass's 1847 suggestion that God had abandoned African Americans: "Frederick, is God dead?" Truth is remembered today for another rhetorical question she asked at a convention of women's rights advocates in 1850. Suggesting that the feminist movement had marginalized African American women, Truth asked the convention of suffragists, "Ar'n't I a woman?" Made famous by Harriet Beecher Stowe in an 1863 Atlantic Monthly article, Truth was dubbed the "Libyan Sibyl" and became a national icon of the evangelical and abolitionist movements.

Olive Gilbert (1801-1884) met Sojourner Truth during their mutual membership in the Northampton Association, a utopian community based on the philosophy of Charles Fourier and located in what is now Florence, Massachusetts. Gilbert began taking dictation for Truth's Narrative (1850) after the Northampton Association disbanded in 1846 but spent almost two years during her service as Truth's amanuensis in Daviess County, Kentucky, observing the realities of slave life firsthand. When she returned to Massachusetts from Kentucky, Gilbert finished composing the Narrative and published it in 1850 with a preface by her friend William Lloyd Garrison. The 1850 edition of Truth's Narrative also reprints a portion of Theodore Weld's American Slavery as It Is (1839) in an appendix. Subsequent editions of the Narrative replace Weld's contribution with a selection of Truth's correspondence and an account of her later life and death.

Given the name Isabella by her parents, Truth is born into slavery, the property "of one Colonel Ardinburgh, Hurley, Ulster County, New York" (p.13). Her parents are already old when she is born, and when Charles Ardinburgh dies approximately nine years later, no one will buy them at the estate's auction. They are manumitted to avoid the expense of feeding them. Because of her youth, Isabella is sold "with a lot of sheep" for "the sum of one hundred dollars" (p. 26). Her new master, John Nealy, whips her frequently "with a bundle of rods, prepared in the embers, and bound together with cords" (p. 27), and Isabella prays for a new master. Her prayer is answered when a fisherman and tavern owner named Scriver buys her from Nealy, and Isabella recalls that "though it seems curious, I do not remember ever asking for any thing but what I got it. And I always received it as an answer to my prayers" (p. 27). Isabella describes Scriver as a relatively humane master and would have been content to remain at his tavern. But when John Dumont offers Scriver seventy pounds for Isabella in 1810, he accepts.

Dumont inspires trust and admiration in Isabella, whose "ambition and desire to please were so great, that she often worked several nights in succession" in order to please the man "she looked upon . . . as a God" (p. 33). Isabella remains devoted to Dumont even after she is mocked by other slaves and whips her five children when they steal extra food. In recognition of her dedicated service, Dumont promises to release Isabella from slavery in 1827, one year before her state-mandated manumission. When Isabella requests her release on the appointed date, however, Dumont refuses. Isabella leaves Dumont and walks to the home of Isaac Van Wagenen, but she does not try to hide. Instead, when Dumont demands her return, Van Wagenen pays him for her last year of service, and because Isabella is legally Van Wagenen's property when she is freed, she acquires the Van Wagenen surname.

Isabella's first action as a free woman is to sue Solomon Gedney, a wealthy white member of the bourgeoisie, for the recovery of her son Peter, whom he had sold out-of-state illegally. With the help of lawyers, she obtains Peter's freedom and takes him to New York City. There, Truth works as a housekeeper for Elijah Pierson and becomes the personal maid of Robert Matthews, the self-proclaimed prophet Matthias and physical reincarnation of God the Father. When Pierson dies and Matthews's following disperses, Isabella becomes a Millerite and adopts their belief that Christ's Second Coming will occur in 1843. She leaves New York City—"what seemed to her a second Sodom"— on June 1, 1843, stopping only to inform her landlady "that her name was no longer Isabella, but SOJOURNER" and that the Spirit had moved her to become an itinerant preacher (p. 100).

Truth travels through the countryside, calling the populace to repentance and explaining "her own most curious and original views" to anyone who will listen, and "when she arose to speak in their assemblies, her commanding figure and dignified manner hushed every trifler into silence" (pp. 101, 113-14). She teaches in camp meetings that "Jesus is the same spirit that was in our first parents, Adam and Eve, in the beginning, when they came from the hand of their Creator" and chastises other preachers who advise their listeners to wait for the Second Coming (p. 69). When a preacher claims that the righteous will be "changed in the twinkling of an eye," Truth retorts, "If the Lord should come, he'd change you to nothing! . . . You seem to be expecting to go to some parlor away up somewhere, and when the wicked have been burnt, you are coming back . . . I am not going away; I am going to stay here and stand the fire, like Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego!" (pp. 111-112). In this and other exchanges, Truth suggests that the adversities of slavery have prepared her for spiritual trials in a way that white preachers could not understand.

In 1843, Truth joins the Northampton Association, where she dictates her story to Gilbert. She hopes to duplicate the commercial success of Frederick Douglass's Narrative (1845), because she has "set her heart upon having a little home of her own" and is "dependent on the charities of the benevolent" (p. 121). Truth's confidence was rewarded: she was able to buy a house with the proceeds from her autobiography, and she spent the balance of her life in relative comfort.

Sojourner truth speech akron ohio

Sojourner truth speech akron ohio, Born into slavery in 1797, Isabella Baumfree, who later changed her name to Sojourner Truth, would become one of the most powerful advocates for human rights in the nineteenth century. Her early childhood was spent on a New York estate owned by a Dutch American named Colonel Johannes Hardenbergh. Like other slaves, she experienced the miseries of being sold and was cruelly beaten and mistreated. Around 1815 she fell in love with a fellow slave named Robert, but they were forced apart by Robert’s master. Isabella was instead forced to marry a slave named Thomas, with whom she had five children.

In 1827, after her master failed to honor his promise to free her or to uphold the New York Anti-Slavery Law of 1827, Isabella ran away, or, as she later informed her master, “I did not run away, I walked away by daylight….” After experiencing a religious conversion, Isabella became an itinerant preacher and in 1843 changed her name to Sojourner Truth. During this period she became involved in the growing antislavery movement, and by the 1850s she was involved in the woman’s rights movement as well. At the 1851 Women’s Rights Convention held in Akron, Ohio, Sojourner Truth delivered what is now recognized as one of the most famous abolitionist and women’s rights speeches in American history, “Ain’t I a Woman?” She continued to speak out for the rights of African Americans and women during and after the Civil War. Sojourner Truth died in Battle Creek, Michigan, in 1883.

Sojourner Truth (1797-1883): Ain't I A Woman?
Delivered 1851
Women's Rights Convention, Akron, Ohio

Well, children, where there is so much racket there must be something out of kilter. I think that 'twixt the negroes of the South and the women at the North, all talking about rights, the white men will be in a fix pretty soon. But what's all this here talking about?

That man over there says that women need to be helped into carriages, and lifted over ditches, and to have the best place everywhere. Nobody ever helps me into carriages, or over mud-puddles, or gives me any best place! And ain't I a woman? Look at me! Look at my arm! I have ploughed and planted, and gathered into barns, and no man could head me! And ain't I a woman? I could work as much and eat as much as a man - when I could get it - and bear the lash as well! And ain't I a woman? I have borne thirteen children, and seen most all sold off to slavery, and when I cried out with my mother's grief, none but Jesus heard me! And ain't I a woman?

Then they talk about this thing in the head; what's this they call it? [member of audience whispers, "intellect"] That's it, honey. What's that got to do with women's rights or negroes' rights? If my cup won't hold but a pint, and yours holds a quart, wouldn't you be mean not to let me have my little half measure full?

Then that little man in black there, he says women can't have as much rights as men, 'cause Christ wasn't a woman! Where did your Christ come from? Where did your Christ come from? From God and a woman! Man had nothing to do with Him.

If the first woman God ever made was strong enough to turn the world upside down all alone, these women together ought to be able to turn it back , and get it right side up again! And now they is asking to do it, the men better let them.

Obliged to you for hearing me, and now old Sojourner ain't got nothing more to say.

Sojourner truth aint i a woman speech

Sojourner truth aint i a woman speech, This is Frances Gage's account of a speech given by Sojourner Truth at the Women's Rights Convention, 1851, in Akron, Ohio. She published the account in The History of Woman Suffrage, volume 1, co-authored with Susan B. Anthony, published in 1881.

Recent scholarship has disputed whether this account, written about 30 years after the speech was given, is an accurate representation of Truth's speaking style. The dialect, in particular, was most likely an addition by Gage.

1881 Account by Frances Gage:

"Wall, chilern, whar dar is so much racket dar must be somethin' out o' kilter. I tink dat 'twixt de niggers of de Souf and de womin at de Nork, all talkin' 'bout rights, de white men will be in a fix pretty soon. But what's all dis here talkin''bout?

"Dat man ober dar say dat womin needs to be helped into carriages, and lifted ober ditches, and to hab de best place everywhar. Nobody eber helps me into carriages, or ober mud-puddles, or gibs me any best place!" And raising herself to her full height, and her voice to a pitch like rolling thunders, she asked "And a'n't I a woman? Look at me! Look at me! Look at my arm! (and she bared her right arm to the shoulder, showing her tremendous muscular power). I have ploughed, and planted, and gathered into barns, and no man could head me! And a'n't I a woman? I could work as much and eat as much as a man - when I could get it - and bear de lash a well! And a'n't I a woman? I have borne thirteen chilern, and seen 'em mos' all sold off to slavery, and when I cried out with my mother's grief, none but Jesus heard me! And a'n't I a woman?

"Den dey talks 'bout dis ting in de head; what dis dey call it?" ("Intellect," whispered some one near.) "Dat's it, honey. What's dat got to do wid womin's rights or nigger's rights? If my cup won't hold but a pint, and yourn holds a quart, wouldn't ye be mean not to let me have my little half-measure full?" And she pointed her significant finger, and sent a keen glance at the minister who had made the argument. The cheering was long and loud.

"Den dat little man in black dar, he say women can't have as much rights as men, 'cause Christ wan't a woman! Whar did your Christ come from?" Rolling thunder couldn't have stilled that crowd, as did those deep, wonderful tones, as she stood there with outstretched arms and eyes of fire. Raising her voice still louder, she repeated, "Whar did your Christ come from? From God and a woman! Man had nothin' to do wid Him." Oh, what a rebuke that was to that little man.

Turning again to another objector, she took up the defense of Mother Eve. I can not follow her through it all. It was pointed, and witty, and solemn; eliciting at almost every sentence deafening applause; and she ended by asserting: "If de fust woman God ever made was strong enough to turn de world upside down all alone, dese women togedder (and she glanced her eye over the platform) ought to be able to turn it back, and get it right side up again! And now dey is asking to do it, de men better let 'em." Long-continued cheering greeted this. "Bleeged to ye for hearin' on me, and now old Sojourner han't got nothin' more to say."

Amid roars of applause, she returned to her corner, leaving more than one of us with streaming eyes, and hearts beating with gratitude. She had taken us up in her strong arms and carried us safely over the slough of difficulty turning the whole tide in our favor. I have never in my life seen anything like the magical influence that subdued the mobbish spirit of the day, and turned the sneers and jeers of an excited crowd into notes of respect and admiration. Hundreds rushed up to shake hands with her, and congratulate the glorious old mother, and bid her God-speed on her mission of "testifyin' agin concerning the wickedness of this 'ere people."

Patrick henry governor of virginia

Patrick henry governor of virginia, Colonel Rogers Clark from Virginia, with Governor Patrick Henry's help, recruited Scotch-Irish and German frontiersmen from Southwest Virginia, and from Washington and Greene Counties Tennessee (then in North Carolina) and rafted his men 1000 miles down the Ohio River from Pittsburgh (Ft. Pitt), Pennsylvania (on right) in winter to make a successful surprise attack against British installations in present -day Illinois and Vincennes, in present-day Indiana.

Colonel Clark captured that vast territory for the United States in the American Revolutionary War. He received ammunition and other munitions aid from Oliver Pollock and the Spanish Governor De Galvez in New Orleans which was helpful.

Clark's frontier riflemen at times marched through waist-deep icy waters to make the surprise attack. They were hardy and courageous fighters for freedom.

Governor Patrick Henry and his frontiersmen fought successful wars on several fronts during the American Revolution.

Henry supplied men from Virginia for the Washington's Continentals, his Regular army.

Henry also supplied men to fight from his state militia forces.

Henry aided Daniel Boone and his westerners in Kentucky which was then a part of Virginia in holding the Kentucky territory for George Washington.

And Henry backed to the hilt Colonel George Rogers Clark in Clark's winning of the vast Northwest for the Revolutionary forces of Washington, clear over into Ohio, Indiana and Illinois. Clark's victories there cinched that territory for America during the negotiations for peace which settled the war with England.

James McCord who was on the payroll of Virginia Captain John Allison's Company with George Rogers Clark was killed on July 9, 1780 while on Clark's expedition to the Northwest.

1776 AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN VIRGINIA

In 1776 John and Samuel McCord, living some 15 miles from Thomas Jefferson's home at Monticello, and who were in his legislative district when he was in the Virginia state legislature then, petitioned Jefferson in writing for religious freedom in order to be able to freely practice their religious faith.

Scotsman Governor Patrick Henry saw to it that a religious freedom section, section 15, was included in the Virginia Constitution in July 1776 at the time of Virginia's independence and his election as its first Governor. Patrick Henry personally drafted that religious freedom section of the state constitution.

These McCords were in the Presbyterian Church while the Anglican church was the state church of Virginia, the so-called 'established church,' from which the phrase "Establishment of Religion" in the Bill of Rights is derived.

The Presbyterians and the Baptists were the two principal forces who successfully fought for religious freedom in Virginia against the "Established" Anglican church, the official state church of Virginia under its colonial government.

Governor Patrick Henry of Virginia, a dedicated Christian, and Governor George Clinton of New York led the fight for Religious Freedom and Freedom of Speech and the other Bill of Rights guarantees, forcing James Madison to introduce a Bill of Rights to the Continental Congress in June 1789 which was approved by the Congress in September 1789 and sent to the states for ratification.

Andrew McCord, close friend of Governor George Clinton of New York State played a role with Clinton in that successful fight for our Bill of Rights, it is reported.

James Madison had opposed a Bill of Rights. Clinton and Patrick Henry's role in the Bill of Rights has been described earlier (see New York).

PATRICK HENRY, PUBLIC ENEMY NO. 1 OF KING GEORGE III

Earlier in the 1760's Patrick Henry, then a Virginia militia Colonel, faced down the Colonial Governor of Virginia with Henry's militia troops and forced the British Governor in the famous "Gunpowder Affair" to return a large quantity of gunpowder set aside for the Virginia militia by the Colonial legislature.

The Governor had taken the gunpowder away, sequestering it, where the militia commanded by Colonel Patrick Henry would not have access it, and stored it aboard his ship anchored in the Virginia harbor.

Colonel Patrick Henry with a regiment of militia then marched on the Virginia capitol forcing the Governor to return the gunpowder to the militia's control. For this, Patrick Henry became thereafter "Public Enemy No.1" in the eyes of the British.

Ever since those days, the Bill of Rights 2nd Amendment's 'Right to Bear Arms' (including gunpowder) has been a precious liberty and guarantee of freedom for Virginians. It has been their protection against despotism, they believe

Patrick Henry of Virginia spoke out against British tyranny in 1765, and again in 1775 with his famous "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death" speech which motivated the Virginia Provincial Convention to bear arms against England and then to vote for independence from it. Patrick Henry is considered one of the greatest orators of all time.

Patrick Henry of Scottish descent was later first Governor of Virginia in 1776 and is given credit for being responsible for our 1789-90 Bill of Rights which we have and its precious freedoms of speech and religion which it contains.

Patrick Henry is considered one of the world's greatest orators of all time.

Scottish American Hall of Fame

Jim Thomson, creator of the Scottish American Hall of Fame, once wrote: “History books say little about the Scottish role in the settlement and development of America. The story is too often lost under the heading English, or British, or even Scotch-Irish. Nevertheless, the Scottish contribution was considerable and at times crucial. Before he was 30, Patrick Henry impressed his critics with his skill at declamation, generally laced with references to the importance of self-government and human rights.” Thomas Jefferson said of him, “His voice flowed in torrents of sublime eloquence.”

Patrick Henry was born on May 29, 1736 at Studley, Virginia. He was the son of John Henry, a well-educated Scot who emigrated to Virginia with a considerable number of other people from Scotland. His father served as a judge, surveyor, and army officer. He had been educated at Aberdeen University. “It was the rugged, cantankerous Scottish frontiersmen, mainly in Virginia, but also Pennsylvania, with little or no loyalty to the British monarchs who touched off the first fires of rebellion. And the man who struck the match was Patrick Henry, the silver tongued orator, son of John Henry from Aberdeen.”

“Henry’s was the first voice raised against England in her attempt to impose taxation without representation. He rose to his full stature in attacking the infamous Stamp Act, which was hotly debated at the House of Burgesses in Williamsburg in 1765. The other delegates quailed when Henry hurled defiance at George III with the challenge, ‘If this be treason, make the most of it’.”

His most famous speech was delivered in 1775 at St. John’s Church in Richmond. His words centered around human rights and individual liberty which could only win independence from the British Crown. “With courage and eloquence, he cried, “Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death.”

When the revolution ended, Henry continued working for individual freedom. His greatest contribution to the nation was in working for the adoption of the Bill of Rights. “He was adamant in demanding protection of basic individual civil liberties.”

The first governor of Virginia, he served five exhausting terms. In 1794, he retired and resumed private legal practice. “Failing health forced him to refuse numerous posts, including Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court, Secretary of State and minister to Spain and to France. He even turned down a sixth term as governor.

“George Washington persuaded Patrick Henry to become a candidate for the state legislature in 1799. The foundations of the young republic were endangered by the rumblings of men who argued that any state has the power to nullify acts of the Federal Government. Bowed with age and his health deteriorating, Henry delivered his last public oration. It was an inspiring, non-partisan, patriotic appeal for unity to preserve the nation. Historian Henry Adams declared that nothing in Henry’s life was more noble than his last public act.”

“Three months later, on June 6, 1799, death came to Patrick Henry. The ‘Voice of the Revolution’ was silenced forever.”